Due Diligence
I figured out early on in law school that I was not going to be at the top of my class. The way the grading curve worked, a tiny percentage of students got A's, and a tiny percentage got C's (or below), while the vast majority ended up somewhere in the B/B+ realm. For the first time in my life, I was completely fine with being one of those people in the middle. The way I figured it, I could work my tush off and still not end up in the top teeny percent who got A's, and anyway I was at a top law school and would end up gainfully employed, so why not enjoy myself?
This meant that, along with learning about torts and property and constitutional law, I got to learn about the sights and nightlife of New York City instead of just the inside of our (rather unattractive) library. I made a few like-minded friends, and while we put in time studying like anyone else, we could almost as often be found swing dancing at some retro joint or sipping Champagne at a velvety lounge listening to jazz.
Toward the end of the second semester of my first year, the inevitable push to prepare cram for finals came, and I started outlining my notes and reviewing prior exams as usual. Somehow, though, my Criminal Law class escaped my attention until a few days prior to the exam, when I looked up and said something like, "Oh, shit. Crim Law."
My friend Erik (not his real name), who would become my roommate for the following two years, was in my section, and we came to this stark realization around the same time. It went something like this: Him: "Have you studied at all for Crim Law?" Me: "Uh, no. Shit. Crim Law."
We decided, two nights before the exam, to study together. (I hate to use a cliche, but there is no better example in this world of the blind leading the blind.) We printed out the professor's old exams and model answers. We cobbled together a pathetic excuse for an outline of our own, then gathered our books and class notes and set out to find a place to study.
We didn't want to be anywhere near campus, as the pressure-cooker environment around finals was too much for anyone to bear, especially for people like us, who tried our best to stay out of conversations involving ugly things like grades or possible test hypos or, essentially, anything related to the law whatsoever. We settled on a bar/diner down in the East Village that's open 24 hours a day and at all times offers food and coffee, and booze, should we need it.
We arrived at the diner around 8 PM, as it buzzed with NYU students gearing up for a night out. We took a corner table where we could spread out all of our criminal law detritus and not be overly distracted by our surroundings. We ordered some snacks and coffee and informed our waiter that we were in for the night. He could sense the quiet desperation coming off of us in waves, so he kept the coffee coming and threw in a dessert for us to share on the house.
Erik and I bantered for a while over dinner and then, reluctantly, got down to business. We picked up the prior year's exam and decided to give it a shot, cold. We'd each outline our answers and then compare them, and then see how they rated on the model answer. We both scribbled furiously for a while, occasionally shaking our pencils in the air with an "a-HA!" when we thought of an especially brilliant point and thoughtfully sipping our coffee when our momentum was slowed by a wrinkle in the fact pattern. After an hour, we put down our pencils and compared answers. "Ohhh, nice! Good catch!" we'd say, lauding each other's brilliance as we compiled our responses. "That really was not so bad, was it?" we'd wonder aloud, thinking we had caught all of the professor's tricky turns of plot in the hypotheticals.
And then we picked up the model answer. We stared, slackjawed, at the twenty-five single-spaced pages of analysis, which was so detailed, so complex and so....so impossible that we could hardly believe this was what the professor expected of a bunch of first-year law students. We lost hope after the first couple of paragraphs. Sure, some of our points were in there, but they were mere fragments of thoughts, suggestive of a child's understanding of the subject. We waved our waiter over and ordered a couple of glasses of wine. It was going to be a long night.
Working from the model answer, we waded sedulously through our notes and casebooks, sweating to retain some small part of the policy considerations and bigger-picture concepts in addition to the facts and holdings of the cases themselves. At two in the morning, nearly spent, we closed our books, neatened the stacks of legal paper strewn about our table, and asked our waiter to watch our things. We staggered outside, gulping the fresh air, and headed straight for the nearest bar.
It was a candlelit lounge, awash in flowing organza and intimate banquette nooks, but it swam before our bleary eyes. I ordered a White Russian, which I'd never had before and never did again (although it was exceedingly tasty), and Erik had a Scotch. We stared hopelessly into space, occasionally patting each other's arms in a mindless and fruitless gesture of comfort.
Oh, shit. Crim Law, indeed.
At some point as we sat there, punchiness set in. We devised a plan. "Wouldn't it be funny," I said, "if we showed up for the exam looking like we'd come straight from a night out, like an all-night bender of some kind?" Erik chuckled. "Yeah... Yeah, I'd be in a tux, with the tie undone and my shirt maybe a little torn." I picked up the thread, "I'd be in heels, my hair disheveled and my makeup smudged, and I'd have your jacket draped around my shoulders."
We were laughing far more than the situation warranted. Erik sipped his Scotch and went on, "No! No. Here it is. We come in, we sit down, we look around at everyone....and then we take out a cocktail shaker." I was giggling hysterically. "YES. That's it! We bring out an ice bucket and drop the ice into the shaker, piece by piece, and then we pour in something -- ginger ale, I don't know -- that looks like liquor into a martini glass --" "And then, we look up, toast the class and drain it!"
By now, we were bent over our table, laughing so hard we could hardly see. We were convinced of the brilliance of our idea. We would do it. We would go down in law school history. No one would know what to make of it. Hell, we were going to go down in flames on this exam as it was. The proctors -- who were curmudgeonly at best and downright cruel at worst -- would be beside themselves, but they couldn't do anything! After all, there was no rule prohibiting ginger ale -- or cocktail shakers, for that matter -- into an exam.
We strolled back to the diner, arm in arm, chortling over our plan. We ordered another round of food and coffee and started to study again, but we interrupted each other frequently to embellish our plot and iron out the details. We watched other diners come and go -- including one memorable couple who were obviously on their first date and it was NOT going well -- and began the inevitable late-night pontification about philosophy and human nature and dating and psychology and all sorts of things, pretty much everything BUT Criminal Law. Our waiter cashed out -- we gave him a massive tip, for which he thanked us profusely and we waved off his gratitude with the hubris of two people on the brink of self-destruction -- and the sun came up and the gray light spread through the emptied-out diner, and it was time to go home.
That day, we studied some more in our respective dorm suites, and then later in the evening, we reconvened, mostly to talk about how royally screwed we were. We thought fondly on the previous night, and we laughed some more about our big plan, but we both knew it wasn't going to happen. We both knew we would fail alone, and in obscurity. After all, we weren't even going to be in the same room for the test; I was at the beginning of the alphabet and he was at the end, and they split the section in half for all of our exams. We wouldn't have even gotten in the door of the lecture hall together.
On exam day, we suffered mightily through what was, without a doubt, the hardest test I've ever taken. It was sixteen pages long -- that's the QUESTIONS -- and the fact patterns were so labrynthine that I barely knew my own name after reading the first hypothetical. There were three separate questions, each of which involved about 52 subparts, and the exam was just three hours long. If I've ever come close to having a nervous breakdown during an exam, this was it. The final question, which I reached with two seconds left in the test period, was to DRAFT A STATUTE. Not to spot issues or write about policy considerations. No. Draft a statute. Which is just, I don't know, not something law students DO. And, by the way, it was a statute on rape, which we had not even covered in class.
I went home in a daze, and Erik and I never spoke about the exam, except to say something like, "Um. Yeah. Shit. Crim Law." We never spoke about our grades, although I'm sure he probably got an A, because he's, well, brilliant, and also just Like That, like he could walk into class and have no idea what was going on, and he would raise his hand and join right into the discussion. Whereas I sat in class every day taking copious notes and hadn't the faintest clue what was going on, and if someone had asked me to join the discussion, I would have leapt out the nearest window.
I, of course, got a B. Or maybe it was a B+. And one of my greatest regrets in life will be not having followed through on our plan.